DivisionByZero

Thanks for reviewing and approving this, @tabrindle! Are you planning to merge it soon, or is there anything else you need before proceeding? Just let me know if there's anything...

I'll mark this with "needs decision" since I'm not sure whether a boolean flag or "fixing" te current implementation is the right way to go here.

@woldaker Thanks for taking action on your own already. Please note that actually merging your PR might take some time. This is not because we don't like your feature but...

> I can make those changes at some point this week after work. Just making sure: You only "need" to do the changes I specifically marked in the PR. You...

> EDIT: I realized that that last paragraph would only be true if every country actually had their own RoutingNumber() function. This PR as simply an improvement to the current...

I'll remove the `s: waiting for user interest` label since this is a simple addition for a locale.

@viraxslot are you still planning to work on this? Otherwise I'd unassign you again. That way the issue will be open for other people from the community to pick up.

No problem. Our current locale setup would also allow for you to translate only single entries (author, book names, etc) at the time. Every single entry to a locale makes...

This sounds reasonable to me. I'd be in favor of manual, sequential PRs to further reduce the noise from renovate rebases as described by ST-DDT.

> IMO we clearly define our needs/requirements. If you choose to ignore them using js, non strict ts or unsafe casts, then you are on your own. I don't know...