Will Yardley

May be worth seeing if one of the rabbitmq devs could weigh in, but if I’m understanding the proposed solution, I’m good with it. Ideally, any PR implementing it would...

With the test case specifically, IMO, it’s a bad test case because one plugin being installed is also a dependency of the other. So either way, the test should include...

Seems similar to this issue (though of course different key): https://puppet.com/blog/updated-puppet-gpg-signing-key https://tickets.puppetlabs.com/browse/MODULES-3307 We also have a ticket for discussion of moving the signing key into the module itself, rather than...

Not sure what that is; you're welcome to contribute a pull request if you'd like, and someone can review it. Keep in mind, though, that we're moving towards making the...

@kwisatz: I think that your analysis is right on. By default, the module will enable the repo (though we're considering changing this default in a future version), and ensure that...

@micah-uber: can you post the error you're getting? As noted in #967, I don't think PPA will work for Debian.

@kali-brandwatch From what I was able to glean, the apt provider is _supposed_ to be smart about things like this, at least in recent versions (https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppetlabs-apt/blob/master/lib/puppet/provider/apt_key/apt_key.rb#L47-L49), though I don't think...

@kali-brandwatch ps - what Puppet version are you using? I took a quick look at at Puppet 3.8 and I don't think it has this version of the Apt provider....

@kali-brandwatch Thanks for the details. I spoke with someone, and sounds like puppetlabs-apt is a stand-alone module which is separate from the apt provider, so you might need to install...

@dol Is reworking this something you'd be able to contribute a PR / tests for?