lazymio
> Hello, is this still an open issue on RISC-V? Specifically, I am finding that the "sw" instruction is not consistently invoking the "UC_HOOK_MEM_READ". @LatinScribe That's a different issue (and...
> Just to clarify, I realized I made a typo on my previous comment. It's **"lw"** that is not invoking "UC_HOOK_MEM_READ", _not_ "sw". sw (storing) seems to work fine, it's...
The commit itself looks good and I will accept it as a PR.
Sorry missed the notification since I'm on a deadline of this Friday. Could you also add the unit test to the PR?
Thanks for the suggestions and this is indeed a big limitation. However, I dislike to have `dyn AnyRegister` and we should have `reg_read(&self, reg: T)` or so.
`:Any` seems not really necessary
Also it is possible to return an `enum`, right?
> I think restricting the type of input to reg read/write functions to anything that is a "Register" makes sense, but I disagree with the enum return value and the...
I confirmed that we missed hooking the instructions. Will fix in the next release.
> > can you look at the issues of the CI? > > Fixed all of those except arm64 & ppc64 failures. The arm64 bits may be fixed by #1935...