Wendy Seltzer

Hi @FlorianLudwig , the goal of the [W3C software license](https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-software-20021231) is to make code available for free re-use with attribution and disclaimer of warranty. If you're encountering an issue with...

(We know @equalsJeffH was a member of the group at the time he made the PR. If/when it's ready for merging, we can deal with the IPR bot.)

Noting that @equalsJeffH made his contributions while a Member participant in the WG, and thus with IPR commitments under the W3C Patent Policy, I'm dismissing the IPR bot with "non-substantive"...

For REC-track documents, the patent disclosure request is important to have visible and prominent, since it's a trigger for Patent Policy obligations supporting the royalty-free policy. (Sorry!)

To be an effective "notice" of copyright, it needs to be visible to those seeing the document. Even when using a permissive license, we want to give notice of its...

There's consensus in PSIG that PRD is an appropriate means of gathering patent commitments and calls for exclusion. [minutes](https://www.w3.org/2022/02/14-psig-minutes.html#ResolutionSummary) PSIG discussed various opinions on whether the Process CG should address...

As PSIG discussed the issue, it was in the context of an existing PRD publication that involves a call for consensus.

@frivoal We envisioned actively "publishing" a document as PRD. Under existing process, that involves getting consensus of the WG to publish. PSIG did not agree that a document without such...

Anonymity has a different (and I'd suggest smaller) role in multistakholder decision processes than it does in an adversarial contest. In multistakeholder decisions, *whose* stake is being poked is an...

The PR reflects one opinion, not consensus in this thread.