Matt Senate
Matt Senate
Updated title to reflect that the goal is to do this programmatically for quality, with community control at heart, not just automatically. ;)
#78 and a brief note on #79 with #80 too.
Bugz: #75 #73 #72 #71 #67 #66 #65 #63
Interesting, should we consider adding another link to the reference that says "source code" and points to the appropriate DOI, code repository, etc? How might this work in the Wikimedia...
seems to be a "rights" tag `` here http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd
Interesting, @mitar, the definition and list of values for the `license` field look off: License to access this actual manifestation of the publication or dataset. Available values are: 12 Months...
Yes, I am familiar. My comment was about how the openaire spec doesn't contain what we want to reveal: the specific license in use, namely is it a Creative Commons...
It's not a direct question, it seems clearly that their standard does not include the data we need. IMHO, "license" should correspond to a "copyright license" not to some reductive...
this is consistent with publishing "copyright/license" info in references, but suggests the next step, to signal potentially the other dimensions of OA.