Wolfgang Preimesberger

@s-scherrer thanks for the feedback. I will update this PR. I will also add an small example notebook, which might clear up a few things.

Just to be sure: qa4sm uses the `cdf_beta_match` method https://github.com/awst-austria/qa4sm/blob/master/validator/models/validation_run.py#L25 --> when changing the name in pytesmo we have to change it in qa4sm as well. I think it would...

sorry, I don't really now about other implementation. CCI uses a different one. I would try to implement everything in pytesmo and then use pytesmo in CCI (also the inner-annual...

@pstradio can you update the descriptions?

Hi, thanks for the response. It's really a great tool and it would be a shame if we could not use all of its features. Currently we are using the...

Hi @lizhuoq. Thanks for bringing this up. Yes these are the correct units. Still, I think you have a valid point that it is not immediately clear what the correct...

Hi, thanks for reporting this. Unfortunately I could not reproduce the error so far (I have downloaded all data for 2017 from the ismn platform yesterday, maybe there was a...

After some testing, I think there might be a bug with parallel extraction from the zip archive. I'm looking into this. I suggest to use parallel=False (Default) for now when...

https://github.com/awst-austria/qa4sm/blob/master/validator/validation/filters.py#L47

I have implemented the above suggested changes. There is now an example in the the notebook at `pytesmo/docs/examples/validation_framework.ipynb`. The `GenericDatetime` has been renamed to `YearlessDatetime` which better reflects the purpose....