Adam Wong

@asyba As mentioned already, Step Functions is supported in the [AWS Toolkit for VS Code](https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=AmazonWebServices.aws-toolkit-vscode). Is this the same kind of functionality you'd like to see in the JetBrains plugin?...

Interesting, I think that's a feature the Step Functions or SageMaker service needs to support. Step Functions will retry with the same parameters. A workaround that could be done today...

Hi @DyfanJones, You're right. [Workflow](https://aws-step-functions-data-science-sdk.readthedocs.io/en/stable/workflow.html#stepfunctions.workflow.Workflow) class doesn't expose a logging configuration parameter but there's no reason it shouldn't be in there as an optional parameter. By default, logging is off....

"Support placeholders for Map state" is a broad topic - let's clarify what this means and enumerate the specific use cases and feature gaps. In @mochacafe's code example there are...

Makes sense. We received similar request in https://github.com/aws/aws-step-functions-data-science-sdk-python/issues/116 I agree this would be a breaking change. I'm not sure how many customers are using this SDK without sagemaker. So far,...

> An implementation detail prevents us from using the CDK where the step functions are defined Can you elaborate on what issue prevents you from using CDK? @DrewThomasCorps

> Manual test: Generated a workflow with a Task with StepResult placeholder and executed successfully This is very unspecific. Can you share the SDK code you used to generate that?

You can create a scheduled rule today by calling EventBridge `put_rule` and `put_targets` with boto3. Is there a different way you'd like to see this done in the Step Functions...

Thanks for providing a code example. Adding an abstraction in SDK makes sense, especially with the CFN template. However, I would like to be cautious about making it general purpose...

@a13zen We're taking another look at the PR to get this shipped soon. Sorry for the delay!