Wolfgang

Would love to see `addr:unit` supported too. There is - once again - a raging discussion in the Austrian community to institute redundant tagging as in `addr:housenumber=24/7` instead of `addr:housenumber=24`,...

> This is maybe slightly off-topic for this bug, but is there a reason not to tag the full address to the entrance node? Well, that's what the discussion in...

One approach to the above is the discussion on the "landcover" tag, which might mean that there is a single layer of adjacent polygons describing the surface of the earth...

It might be helpful to put this in the Wiki examples as well.

On a possibly related topic (see #26): The wiki pages on multipolygons ([[1]](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation%3Amultipolygon), [[2]](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon/Algorithm)) state that > when the relation has tags, the tags on the outer ways should be...

Nice! I'd also suggest to evaluate the number of multipoly relations without an area tag (irrespective of which other tags they carry). A rough tag list is in #17 (last...

@ImreSamu Just for information, I've fixed most of the issues in LIST_RELATION_NO_TYPE for Austria with exception of public transport, hiking routes and some weird stuff.

Another case for cleanup are ways tagged with "type=multipolygon". There were about 100 cases in Austria, which I'm working on. Most are left overs and the tag can be deleted,...

A database query for relations with "type=multipolygon" and excluding tags ['landuse', 'natural', 'building', 'waterway', 'highway', 'leisure', 'amenity', 'boundary', 'railway', 'tourism', 'place', 'man_made', 'public_transport'] will yield 639 old-style or suspicious multipolygons...