Bill Traynor

@ThinkOpenly I asked Bill McSpadden and he say in the [SAIL repo](https://github.com/riscv/sail-riscv), the files of interest are: riscv_types_kext.sail riscv_insts_z*.sail

There would appear to be an open [PR for that implementation](https://github.com/riscv/sail-riscv/pull/234).

> To @[[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) and @[[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]), please review this ePMP spec issue and (hopefully) approve this acronym update to address an RVI friendly language policy violation. Can I get a quick...

Agreed. I'll leave this here for further discussion. Similarly, an alternative name could be "Machine Mode Allowlist Policy (mseccfg.MMAP)" which seems closer to the original intent.

OK, I've updated to PR. On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 5:34 AM Krste Asanovic ***@***.***> wrote: > Andrew's suggested acronym expansion is fine with me. > > — >...

@Andrew Waterman ***@***.***> can you comment here? This litmus test image is copied directly from the published version of the spec. On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 3:27 AM Hengyu...

Note that I don't believe this was ever fixed and it therefore made it into the riscv-isa-manual at time of integration. The text post integration reads: "The Bit-manipulation for Cryptography,...

Closing as reordering patch applied.

@aswaterman have you had a chance to take a look at these preface updates? Once merged, we can publish PDFs for internal review. Note that the Unpriv changelog does not...

@aswaterman I've applied your two suggestions. If we're good to go, I'll publish today.