Daniel Ethridge

[not sure where to ask this] I'm wondering if there is an even more elegant approach syntax for these different types of accesses (normal `a.b`, optional `a?.b`, and infallible `a!.b`)....

I came across this issue while searching for existing solutions for part of a UI library I'm writing. In essence, the DOM needs a way to move a child node...

> Please go read the past discussion in this issue as well as [whatwg/html#5484](https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/5484) before making any suggestions ... It's really counterproductive to keep repeating the same discussion every 2-3...

Sorry for the miscommunication, I meant atomic move among siblings, the primitive operation enabling the proposal. The animation problem that the Mithril maintainer mentioned would be orthogonal to this -...

Maybe I misunderstood the problem, but here are my immediate thoughts: Ideally, the DOM would provide a `document.nodesWithinRect()` sort of like [`document.elementsFromPoint`](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Document/elementsFromPoint), and then we could just test if there...

@jordanl17 don't edit without commenting why — it's now inaccurate, the original `"a b"` is correct