W. Trevor King

Some previous discussion in [1,2,3,4]. [4] looks like #16. But I haven't gone through those threads carefully enough to post a summary yet. [1]: https://lists.spdx.org/pipermail/spdx-tech/2015-October/002855.html Subject: Is "+" a valid...

I've pushed cf8decf → 9c8d189 addressing some of @goneall's points and including a few more copy-edits. Outstanding issues are: * Whether we want to keep `` now that we're adding...

I've pushed 9c8d189 → 922031a dropping `` and adding `` now that @goneall [gave that a green light][1]. We may come back to external extention definitions in follow-up work. We've...

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 08:29:58AM +0000, Philippe Ombredanne wrote: > > I've allowed + for license-ref (it used to be only for license-id)… > > This does not...

I've pushed 922031a → eafa739 which restores semantic docs for `+` (which I'd accidentally dropped with 922031a) and adds a new explanation of the `AGPL-1.0+` based on [this reasoning][1]. [1]:...

I've pushed 649889f -> afc5c1e, rebasing onto master (around conflicts with eafa739 and b971d8d6). I've also adjusted to the new `-only` and `-or-later` forms which happend in license list v3.0...

I'm happy to split this up if you want to lay out how you want it divided :)

I've pushed 849b91a → 6e8b3bc, addressing Yev's concerns from #58 (except for `PACKAGE-MANAGER` → `PACKAGE_MANAGER`). The `rdf:resource` relationship is now clearer, and I've dropped `OTHER` in favor of allowing authors...

Rebased onto master (around #8) with 9c2b5b7 → 5ecc05d. The rebase also adds a `CONTRIBUTORS.md` update for the shifted CC-BY-3.0 reference (although the old reference was stale anyway, #73).

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 08:25:49AM +0000, Philippe Ombredanne wrote: > Nice, but bad idea IMHO: this is a wart in the NPM doc if you want > my...