William G Hatch

Or perhaps I'm wrong! I'll have to look through the implementation and see if/where I'm using some non-deterministic hash-table traversal or gensym...

I've removed some code that was likely the culprit (gensyms in macros that I was using for some reason). So if this were re-done using the master branch it would...

@samth Thanks. After trying to think of a more convenient way and failing, I've been doing exactly that. Which leads me to the bad news that it's still not reproducible....

So my last statement of isolation was way off, that was just an artifact of the way I first started re-kicking builds. At this point it seems that: Rash's `main.rkt`...

@samth Thanks for your help on this, by the way. Aside from gensym and hash-table traversals, are there any other features that come to mind? As far as I know,...

>1. It looks like there's an options hash that gets put into the module -- is the order that those keys appear deterministic? That's actually a run-time hash. But I've...

@samth I really appreciate your help on this. Thanks!

On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 01:24:29AM -0700, Paulo Matos wrote: >This is an idea I have been thinking about but I am still not sure if should be part...

For the moment I don't think I'll put `#` as comment in the default rash language, and I don't think I want the repl language to diverge that much from...

Thanks for trying Rash! Yes, currently pipelines expect a single return value. I've considered changing it to accept multiple values and automatically convert it to a list, but I'm hesitant...