Wiktor Kwapisiewicz

Ack. Thanks for the sanity check! Sorry for bothering you so often... just for a better context, I'm working on [Signstar](https://signstar.archlinux.page/) which is an Arch Linux signing system for packages...

I've implemented permissions checks when resetting the device but they require this PR to be merged to pass the tests so for now I'll leave it in a PR in...

> I usually open the PRs directly with a note atop that says "depends on: ..." and leave PR as draft. It's great for visibility imho. Great idea, thanks! Created...

@tony-iqlusion sorry for bothering you but I wonder if you could take a look at this PR :eyes: :bow:

Time to reuse... the [Marker packet](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4880#section-5.8)! 🫠 > Such a packet MUST be ignored when received.

> Using it to get (almost) arbitrary byte amounts of padding would require silly hackery (e.g. mixing "old" and "new" style packet headers, and/or different length encodings). Or just inserting...

> I would recomment to use io errors with the current code, as it allows you to pass at least the string through. Excellent idea! I/O Error has the [`other`...

FWIW I think marking items via `#[doc(hidden)]` makes `cargo-semver-checks` ignore them (since they're considered part of the internal API). It may be worth checking if this could solve the underlying...

Hi, Are there any blockers for un-drafting this PR and merging it? FWIW I'm using -pre versions of these crates and they work really well :) Thanks for your time!...

> I'm curious about hardware tokens. Will those be supported with a unified CLI interface as well? Yes, I actually tested that with my Yubikey and found [a couple of...