Brady Wied

Yes and yes. If you don't require it inside react.rb's code, then sprockets will not include it. That leaves new users to either blindly include `require 'sources/react.js'` on your instructions...

Might be a fair point. How small is small though? And will opal-activesupport stay that way? Maybe as a compromise, getting rid of `require 'active_support'` from `top_level.rb` so that the...

For this one I don't think you need a basic or full react.gem. it's just a matter of a couple more granular requires. sent from my mobile device On Mar...

@catmando @zetachang: I like the define_state initial value shortcuts and params shortcuts. For reading state, is it really a good idea to cache state or encourage people to read state...

Assuming this is going to split into 2 or 3 GEMs, maybe each GEM could be made an issue label and the issues can be tagged appropriately. If this is...

@ajjahn It seemed like from the code that #1 is rather isolated from #3 already, no? I definitely agree with keeping #2 separate. Rails should not be required for the...

Setting a goal for a 4th (testutils) sounds fine to me. My main goal here is trying to grasp the state of the project and see where the open issues...

I think where this stands then is if you guys do a README (that expands on what's already there) that outlines how the split would work, then apply some labels...

@Thermatix - seems like a pretty tremendous undertaking. Wouldn't it be better off going the Clearwater direction if that's what you want?

Just my opinion, but it would be hard for me to see the value in trying to build that, especially for the core react.rb project. I've seen many case of...