Josh Bundt

Another instance of about 6K processes per fuzzing process ```shell localuser@bot12b:~/archive/logs$ ps ax | wc -l 18278 localuser@bot12b:~/archive/logs$ ps ax | grep '\[duk\] ' | wc -l 5909 localuser@bot12b:~/archive/logs$ ps...

It appears this PR broke something in the python bindings? #1929

> getting symcc working in fuzzbench was a horrible experience as the image is based on an old ubuntu ... > it might be difficult for the CI as I...

@lszekeres The changes are not really independent because I use the new summary table in the fuzzer template report. However, switching to the the new summary table in the default...

In reviewing results on previous experiments using the default report, I find it challenging to really get a wholistic view of how a fuzzer performs across benchmarks. I found my...

One more note, because the report is organized by fuzzer in rank ascending order, you are likely to want to compare one fuzzer to the fuzzer either directly above or...

I went ahead and split this into two separate PRs as you originally suggested. I'll take another look at how to make this report more intuitive and useful.

looks like the url was missing a `input/`? the config is here : http://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/fuzzbench-data/index.html?prefix=2021-06-07-crash/input/config/ I noticed the coverage binary was compiled with llvm-9, is that normal for bug benchmarks?? with...

Centos7 is what I have used and has always been stable. I'll pull the docker image and test.

Where is the Dockerfile? Are there updated builds? This is what I found (gcr.io/fuzzbench/runners/qsym/freetype2-2017)