wfpokorny

Jim cleaned up many of the documentation issues mentioned for the 3.7.1 release. See the following newsgroup thread: http://news.povray.org/povray.documentation.inbuilt/thread/%3C5846a45e%241%40news.povray.org%3E/ Another top to bottom review should probably be done for 3.7.2...

I suspect this issue might be tangled with GH#121 & FS#324.

See my response in the pull #358 thread. Quickly. Do nothing for v3.8. Merge Jerome's pull #358 (or implement similar) for v4.0 and sort issues including this one from there....

(I'm a little rushed in writing this, please forgive mistakes) The work I'm doing today ~~isn't~~ is loosely tangled in the proposed changes here with respect to the minimum returned...

> Are you saying we're doing an inside test for each and every secondary ray? Good question. ....Not sure if the test is being done always. It isn’t' if the...

Couple random thoughts as I was drinking my first cup of coffee. - The interior / media speckles patch I have in my head doesn't need to be tied to...

> Having just had a look at invocations of Inside, I see no evidence of insideness-tests when initializing secondary rays. Initialization of primary rays (both camera and photons) does require...

Though I'm buried elsewhere at the moment, I'll try and run the suggested changes here at some point soon-ish as part of one of my many hundreds of scenes for...

FYI. Expect I'll be pulling this branch into a local build for testing against my solver test scenes next week. Re-basing all my branches to the current master to set...

An update after some initial digging and testing. I'll start by saying on going back and reading through the #121 and #125 issues, Jérôme had already determined MIN_ISECT_DIST was created...