Wen Bo Li

I believe this is due to `goyang` not processing "augment" statements inside "uses" statements at all. Is it possible for you to change this to a module-level augment to work...

My personal take is that this doesn't need to be part of the v1 milestone since it doesn't introduce any backwards incompatibility issues, and is likely a corner case not...

This issue is only relevant when unmarshalling JSON. When unmarshalling a `TypedValue`, `YANGEmpty` and bool are indistinguishable from one another in their encoding.

It's actually not this PR, but rather this comment: https://github.com/openconfig/ygot/pull/467#discussion_r707869638 I'm wondering if you think it's worth splitting the util package up into these packages in order to make the...

See #144

Hi Jason, thanks for your changes. It seems that ygot doesn't have good support for extensions (no helpers), and as a result I see two immediate concerns (due to this...

_**TLDR**_: In any case, I agree that we should add both duplicate-check and overlap-check functionality into proto generation, if you don't mind. Then, assuming the extensions get pushed (and there...

Good eye, nested uses statements definitely makes sense as a use-case to me. Added openconfig/goyang#113 to test extensions for nested use statements. List of Error Checks: - duplicate `field-number` extensions....

@jasonewang btw I'm working on getting your changes in.

I have the change ready now, though it's dependent on https://github.com/openconfig/goyang/pull/183.