Bill Nottingham

This would not be done for 'holidays'; recurrence rules can exclude specific dates, so those would need to be entered in full Y/M/D for this to be supported.

Pinning to groups or hosts does not make sense - a playbook only runs on one instance group.

Right, but what you're suggesting is to execute the playbook once on each instance group that may be used by the inventory, limited to those hosts. That can alter how...

Why would you do this and not just prompt for the extra vars / use a survey? It would be functionally identical.

This is not something we currently have control over in general. Pod specs for container group do allow for some of this.

This is intentional, there is not concept of the "host" which has jobs running on it, only the inventory.

Maybe.

... how is this different than the existing custom credential type support? See https://www.ansible.com/blog/ansible-tower-feature-spotlight-custom-credentials and http://docs.ansible.com/ansible-tower/latest/html/userguide/credential_types.html

It is not currently being worked, when it is, more information will be placed here.

This work hasn't even been scoped, so it's too early to discuss design implications such as that. From a use case perspective, it would definitely be the sort of thing...