Wei Zhou

> @GaOrtiga If you update the template to USER, then you will be able to remove it. this will prevent some human mistakes @GaOrtiga @DaanHoogland do you agree and close...

@GaOrtiga @DaanHoogland sorry this PR is not needed in my opinion

> @GaOrtiga as a user wants this convenience. Even when I agree that it is not vital, that would be enough for it to be needed. > > * Is...

@DaanHoogland @GaOrtiga let me explain a bit more users might delete the unused SYSTEM template one or twice every year by average. It takes just few minutes. However, with this...

> The use case would be any operator that wants to delete `SYSTEM` templates and does not know about the workaround, since it's not really something self-explanatory. @GaOrtiga this can...

> > @GaOrtiga @DaanHoogland sorry this PR is not needed in my opinion > > Having a workaround should not be a reason to restrict an operation. If the operator...

> > > > @GaOrtiga @DaanHoogland sorry this PR is not needed in my opinion > > > > > > > > > Having a workaround should not be...

> @weizhouapache > > > Can you tell me how frequent you deleted the SYSTEM template? > > Even if it's not something that is done frequently, it being purposely...

> > I could add a new parameter, maybe `system` to make it very clear on what's the intent of the flag. This would make it so that these templates...

@GaOrtiga will you support it on UI ? API is tested ok ``` (localcloud) 🐱 > delete template id=d0b0a4db-1125-4a99-8cca-cf7934bbc19b { "account": "admin", "accountid": "75837c93-aff0-11ee-8ad9-1e00940002db", "cmd": "org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.template.DeleteTemplateCmd", "completed": "2024-01-26T20:25:33+0000", "created": "2024-01-26T20:25:33+0000",...