weiwangncar

@MrGranddy Please post this to the Forum: https://forum.mmm.ucar.edu/. Thanks.

@Nikolar97 We will get back to you soon.

@Nikolar97 Thank you for updating your branch to v4.4. Let us discuss some ways to maintain your code outside the main repository, and get back to you, hopefully soon.

Test Type | Expected | Received | Failed = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =...

@MichaelLaufer The failed reg test is unlikely your problem. We will run the test again soon.

Have you tried the following when you make the restart run: restart = .true., rst_inname = '../data/test.runwrf/wrfrst_d_', On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 5:50 AM Andreas Hilboll wrote: > I'm...

@joejoeyjoseph If you make the appropriate changes or comment out those problematic checks in module_check_a_mundo.F, does that correct your problem?

@jbzambon Did you use land mask field from ERA5? Depending on where you get the ERA5 data, the land mask field may need to be downloaded separately since it doesn't...

@jbzambon I think what you observed is indeed a problem, even with the proper land mask field LANDSEA. I tested the data and found a similar issue with SST data...

@RJVogel Adding the interp_land_mask entry for SST is another way to prevent bad values of SST entering the model. This is necessary for ERA5 SST field because the SST field...