wehro

The following forms are no compounds. They should be hyphenated according to the general rules. - comitatem (< comitas) - comitates (< comitas) - comit (< como) - comitote (<...

The dictionaries do not know an adjective or participle *abstrutus*. The participle of *abstrudo* is *abstrusus*. It is perhaps better to remove `abstrutus`, `abstruturus` etc. from the test list.

According to the Gaffiot, *abstare* is an intransitive verb; so there should be no passive forms except impersonal ones (third person singular). The following words should be removed from the...

Based on the word list I use for the generation of the classical patterns, I was able to discover the following erroneous hyphenated compounds with *ab* using the liturgical patterns:...

> I suppose the forms `abstravi`, `abstravisti` etc., `abstraveram` etc. and `abstrasse` in the test list are incorrect. The perfect of _abstraho_ is _abstraxi_. I have now realized that these...

The following words are no compounds with *ab*. The liturgical patterns should not hyphenate them after *ab*. - Abiu (Hebrew name, Num 3,2) - Abiud (Hebrew name, Mt 1,13) -...

On the other hand, the related word *tenuiarius* has a vocalic *i* according to Gaffiot and Lewis/Short. So it seems more likely that *tenuia* and *tenuior* have a vocalic *i*...

The word *ambigenus* is a compound (*ambi* + *genus*). The liturgical hyphenation should be *am-bi-ge-nus* rather than *amb-i-ge-nus*.

The following words are not compounds. The should be hyphenated according to the general rules. - Ambianensis (adjective for a Gallic people, cf. ThLL 1, col. 1837, line 18) -...

The following homographs should be documented: - amb-itui (< amb-itus) vs. Ambitui (a people in Galatia) - amb-ivi (< amb-eo) vs. Ambivi (< Ambivius, Latin name)