Lars Kappert

Working on some refactorings and things are coming together nicely, including recursively handling config files in their own workspace. Which is what should handle this case a lot better. It...

Going to close with the release of v5.34.0

Thanks @allista, this is indeed an yet unsupported feature. FYI, at this point I'm not implementing new features so for now you could use the `ignore*` options (which can be...

Closing this issue as part of a general cleanup to keep this project sustainable and optimize my time working on it. If you think this is inappropriate or if there...

> First of all thank you for your project. I have learned a lot from it to build my own dot-files. That's awesome! Great to hear. > How do you...

> Do you still need me to do that, or can you just review all of them at one? Yes, please create separate PRs for separate fixes/features.

> [!WARNING] > > reveal-md is no longer in active development. No new features will be added. Pull requests for bug and documentation fixes will be considered. Occasional dependency upgrades...

> interesting, does this affect any existing package that wants to migrate? (so i know if its a priority to add or not). No, I'm not aware of existing packages...

Not sure how that's related to ignore patterns? You mention "include" parameter, but I think what's being discussed here is negated patterns within the (existing) `ignore: []` option. The (curly)...

My $0.02: ime fast-glob doesn't support negated ignore patterns either, but maybe the issue is that with fast-glob [`!negated` ignore patterns yied the same results](https://github.com/mrmlnc/fast-glob/blob/master/src/tests/e2e/options/ignore.e2e.ts) (as if such patterns are...