Alexander Steffen

To fix a simple regression, really? This is not adding support for new lenses, it is just restoring functionality that was present before and probably got damaged by accident. @sridharb1...

> And history will repeat itself. I see what you mean. I'd still appreciate it if this PR can be merged in time for the next exiv2 release, so that...

Thank you very much, @clanmills. > This means that exiftool most likely also has a problem. Correct, exiftool does not recognize those lenses either. But I did not really care...

> And some of them don't exist in exiftool anymore I'd guess those never existed in exiftool in the first place. So when syncing with exiftool, only new lenses should...

> We can "cook one up a test image" using something like `$ exiv2 -M'set Exif.CanonXX.LensId 172' foo.jpg`. This is basically the idea I had in mind, just that I'd...

> Faking every lens is neither possible Except for things like `33, "Voigtlander or Carl Zeiss Lens"` it should be possible for pretty much all of them, because that is...

> that's more important than further discussion of this PR In the beginning you said: > It is passing the CI, so it can be merged. So I expected it...

> ser2net needs to start after networking The [service file that is used here](https://github.com/archlinux/svntogit-community/blob/packages/ser2net/trunk/ser2net.service) has an `After=network.target`, but that does not seem to be sufficient? > If one fails, do...

> You don't know the configuration is bad until you try to use it, and you can't use it until you shut down the old configuration. True. You'd need to...