Walter

There seems a bug of OpenJDK 9 as well, but they would not fix it: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8160437

cannot replicate now.

I suggest to consider Maven, so you can publish packages to the Maven Central Repository. But there will be a lot of works to migrate `package manager` to Maven. https://docs.github.com/en/actions/guides/publishing-java-packages-with-maven...

Hi Remco, after my investigation, it seemed the expectations for EBSP were totally wrong. I barely remember it was in development and might have been excluded from the test suits...

There were few problems to run BEAST 1: 1. I could not use BEAST 1.10.* in my Mac, which forces to use beagle 3, but throws exception when using it....

I also fixed the names of parameters.

Here is the long run. The stats are very similar to previous log [b1-100M.tar.gz](https://github.com/CompEvol/beast2/files/7192972/b1-100M.tar.gz).

I updated the two XMLs to use HCV dataset. There were some significant changes of BEAST 1. It looks unfamiliar to me now. I tried my best to make both...

I just found beast2 default not to use "Intervals Middle" but beast 1 did, which made above two models different. I will re-run the tests tomorrow.

The new logs at long runs are attached. Both suppose to use the same priors and models: [b1-100M.tar.gz](https://github.com/CompEvol/beast2/files/7199014/b1-100M.tar.gz) [b2-100M.tar.gz](https://github.com/CompEvol/beast2/files/7199015/b2-100M.tar.gz) Tree stats are same. But the coalescent likelihoods and popSizes are...