Klaus Wakonig
Klaus Wakonig
Hi @tacaswell! What's the status on this one? It would help us a lot if we could get this one merged soon. Thanks!
hmm, I never thought about using it for temperatures, I only had reduced data rates in mind. But you are right, calling it "live_status" could open it up to more...
It is more a question of consistency: This caught me very much by surprise that although it implements the `destroy` method, it lacks the ability to check if the destroy...
I can confirm what @cappel89 experienced with 3.5.3 and 3.5.4 and it seems to be resolved on the current master branch. Thanks @newville for the quick fix!