Wah Yuen
Wah Yuen
Ran into the exact same issue as @zapadoody, hours lost before we stumbled onto this ticket here to resolve the issue. The most frustrating part was the lack of clarity...
I can confirm that if you do not specify the `properties` node, that ASP deployment can now succeed. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30f29/30f2947895a06601a10e4fbca338abd073387a4c" alt="image" corresponding ARM template generated during deployment data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/569f7/569f78a67995fa3436442ff6f0c6d236172d7199" alt="image" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93432/93432be2dd7f3dc0555d9ce7a6bc5310ad971e2e" alt="image"
Bump, is there any guidance from the team regarding this issue?
@kinelski part of our confusion currently stems from an issue where the original request has actually been submitted successfully, but subsequently returned an `InternalServerError` We had hoped to follow the...
@kinelski does how the SDK handles this not pose a bit of a contradiction to the statement you are making regarding the 200 response code? I understand what you are...