web-annotation
web-annotation copied to clipboard
w3c
Web Annotation Working Group repository, see README for links to specs
Pros: - JSON-LD and TRIG support named graphs. - There are some use cases, and a history in the Open Annotation model of allowing them Cons: - Complexity required for...
Clients typically display whether the current user can modify an annotation when presenting them to the user. The client might wish to present an edit button only when the edit...
The Next, prev, First, Last are specified as being IRIs, consequnetly, these means that different requests to the same IRI should return the same annotations. However, the number of annotations...
These classes were removed from the vocabulary and the model in #369 due to lack of implementations. We should reconsider their inclusion in version 2.
Should we have a dedicated MIME type (media type) for an annotation? Or should we just use a generic JSON-LD media type? And if there is a dedicated MIME type,...
I noticed the use of the as:generator property from the Activity Vocab CR. They specify that https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocabulary/#dfn-generator describes an Object, which could be a Person (Actor_ - and they recommend...
As per Luc's comment in #7, and the editor's note in the Community specification, the current model does not require separation at the vocabulary level of the conceptual annotation and...
The conclusion of ticket https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/337#issuecomment-238557004 is that there is a M to N relationship between the dc:language of multilingual resources and the text processors that might process the annotation body...
Sometimes you want to have an annotation published only to a particular group, and you may wish to let only those people see it. For example, a reading group, a...
The correspondent of model, message and multipart is missing in the current list of classes for type. Multipart seems to be used for binary streams, model for 3D models and...