tr-pages
tr-pages copied to clipboard
w3c
Work on the w3.org/TR index page (not specs themselves)
Instead of the outdated spec groups, I'd suggest listing WG under which the spec was produced (not least because that has patent commitment relevance).
a set of icons were developed for Web Platforms docs that described the advancement of the various TR status: https://www.w3.org/2013/09/wpd-rectrack-icons/ - maybe re-use them (or a variation) for the new...
We display now this notice at the top of the page: > *“W3C is teaming up with Jefferson University to improve the design of the specification template.”* Once we remove...
Instead of alphabetically, sort the status drop-down: Recommendation Proposed Recommendation Candidate Recommendation Working Draft Group Note Retired Proposed Edited Recommendation (and note somewhere on the page that EDs aren't listed...
Specs are tagged with [CR] but the status drop-down offers "Candidate Recommendation". The drop-down could serve as a key if it instead said "Candidate Recommendation (CR)". and/or we could put...
currently, a "Web API" label shows up on specs that define javascript APIs. most people would probably classify those specs to belong to the general "HTML5" ecosystem of specs: http://html5-overview.net/...
And instead, organise fields of specs in a tabular way, in single rows. /cc @bert-github.
Feedback from @ianbjacobs: >Title >Date >Editors >Group > >Maybe it could be like this: > > Published <date> (<history>) > <Editors list> - <editors draft> > <WG>
Feedback from @ianbjacobs: >* Get rid of them >BUT >* if you keep the tag thing you can sort them by tag and see them in that view: the value...
It's good to be able to search several things. But having the space at the top mostly filled with empty fields is a lot of space for no value. It...
