tr-design
tr-design copied to clipboard
w3c
CSS used by W3C specs (this repo is not about the w3.org/TR index page)
The styling of the warning on https://www.w3.org/TR/css-print/ and https://www.w3.org/TR/css-speech/ is inappropriately obnoxious. Retiring a REC track document to NOTE status is not the same thing as saying that it is...
Re: https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/573#issuecomment-243960648
This was originally [filed on ReSpec](https://github.com/w3c/respec/issues/1752) by @aardrian... but I feel we need to have a larger discussion. The following is a copy/paste from @aardrian's bug linked to above. ##...
This is happening a lot lately (both on generated and static specs... and both on ReSpec and BikeShed generated specs):  I think the problem is...
[[ When W3C WG Note is published “to document work that was abandoned without producing a Recommendation” the tombstone nature of the Note could be visually clearer. Got a bug...
ReSpec no longer produces a wrapping `` around the W3C logo in the header. When multiple logos are used, as in the [SSN spec](https://w3c.github.io/sdw/ssn/), the header now looks like: ```html...
See: http://bitsup.blogspot.com.au/2016/05/cache-control-immutable.html base.css, fixup.js, and the w3c logo are good candidates. This would benefit ReSpec users, as we reload a lot after we make changes.
What the topic says.
See for example: https://getbootstrap.com/javascript/#scrollspy (and see it in action in the nav on the right hand side). Reasoning: it's super hard to understand structure of large specs and especially where...
@npdoty wrote [elsewhere](https://github.com/w3c/respec/issues/1788) - ignore "ReSpec" and just think "web spec": Potential feature/enhancement for ReSpec: it would be nice if authors could easily note that a particular section/feature was a...