Volkan Yazıcı

@Pil0tXia, I would like to share some updates from the `[email protected]` thread: 1. You are not over engineering, you are doing the right thing. 1. To my surprise, almost all...

@Pil0tXia, who is expected to deliver the work? As [I have stated earlier](https://github.com/apache/eventmesh/issues/4720#issuecomment-1878979544), I can implement this feature *as a contractor* – i.e., paid job. Yet I haven't been approached...

_[I am not much familiar with the part of the code base you are talking about, hence apologies in advance if I say something stupid.]_ > will prevent the propagation...

PR?

At [bol.com](https://bol.com/), the biggest online retailer in the Netherlands and Belgium, RFC 7807 is our bread and butter. Judging from the amount of work Zalando has also put into this...

In two Log4j utilities (`log4j-changelog` and `log4j-docgen`) we verify the test result by comparing actual and expected folders. Right now, we roll out [our own `assertDirectoryContentMatches()`](/apache/logging-log4j-tools/blob/main/log4j-changelog/src/test/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/changelog/FileTestUtils.java#L36). Something as simple as...

Do you still observe this issue with the most recent Log4j version, that is, `2.22.1`? > sometimes logging stops getting generated at midnight * Mind elaborating on this please? *...

@ppkarwasz, could you share what are the pros/cons this change will bring? I mean, what are the functional goals we want to achieve and how will this change contribute to...

Thanks, got it. Then I support the proposal. That said, shouldn't we first practice the same for `log4j-core`?

Please no enumerated naming, e.g., `log4j-spi3`. I am fine with `log4j-sdk`. Other alternatives I can think of: * `log4j-runtime` * `log4j-backend` * `log4j-kit` * `log4j-base`