Vinay Sajip

I think venvs should be seen as disposable, and easily recreatable using e.g. `pip install -r requirements.txt`. What's the reason why this can't be done on the odd occasion when...

It is not AFAIK considered good practice to put your source code in a venv directory. From the [Python documentation on `venv`](https://docs.python.org/3/library/venv.html): > A virtual environment is (amongst other things):...

> Which part of me admitting that it was totally my fault you didn't understand? The part where you're complaining here.

> I mean, the way it was written (and there must be other cases of this) it really does give off a code smell, to put it mildly. Sure. I...

> And if you have any questions, by all means. Given the existing signature of the `visit` method of `Node.Visitor` (having a `void` return type), how do you see tree-to-tree...

it's all just software, so "anything is possible". However, for me the biggest problem is development speed. A bottom-up approach like node visiting is just not as productive for me...

> That would have saved ... a lot of work! More the fool for not looking Not at all, and thanks for looking at this, Adam! I wasn't aware of...

For `gpgsm` to be easily usable via `gpgbinary`, it needs to be completely command-line compatible with `gpg`. You may be able to subclass `gnupg.GPG` to get the behaviour you want...

> because it at least claims to support `gpgsm` Sure, but it's years out of date now, as far as I know, so I'm not sure any claims it makes...

> If so, why doesn't `distlib` import They are two separate, independent packages, and _should_ deliver the same result. Both should support PEP425, but PEPs can change, and these are...