Volker Stampa

Thanks for the really quick response :-) We do use [`client.delete_points`](https://docs.rs/qdrant-client/1.9.0/qdrant_client/client/struct.QdrantClient.html#method.delete_points) with a [`PointsSelectorOneOf`](https://docs.rs/qdrant-client/1.9.0/qdrant_client/qdrant/points_selector/enum.PointsSelectorOneOf.html#) with a filter that filters by these `document_id` that are part of the payload. As far...

Sorry for the long delay, but I was distracted. I checked our logs and this is what I figured out: We had 81 inserts on this collection and unfortunately I...

@timvisee Could we re-open this issue please?

Verified that inserting a point into this collection removed the WAL. After that qdrant starts up very quickly and log indicates this WAL size of "1". Creating a snapshot is...

Unfortunately this is something I cannot verify any longer. The problem can be fixed (and was fixed each time it occurred) by deleting the collection. Since then it had been...

Thanks for the quick reply. Just checked the logs again. We did restart and it did help in a sense that we have seen successful inserts into this collection, however...

I do not think there was any Qdrant restart. Otherwise you would see this in the server-logs, wouldn't you? But once released happy to try if this fix makes the...

@generall Thanks for the update. We figured that it is not that easy for us to deploy the dev build to a dedicated environment and continuously run the same tests...

Yes, indeed. Each test creates a "temporary" collection in the beginning then maybe inserts a few vectors and executes a search and then deletes the temporary collection at the end...

Thanks for the quick fix.