Vladimir Kostyukov
Vladimir Kostyukov
This should be done in this milestone. We should be able to test la4j-0.4.9 against 0.5.0 using the same benchmarks.
Right. I think we can start with the following format: 1. Harwell Boeing http://people.sc.fsu.edu/~jburkardt/data/hb/hb.html
Should be done in next release.
@yuronew please go ahead!
I think we should start with refactoring all the `io` package first. Moving it to the next milestone (0.6.0).
Right. But this is an important issue. I believe that users can be devided into two main groups: a) users who has to calculate realy small matrices (like 10x10 and...
Right. With such approach we should be able to handle these intrussive zeros in iterators and nonZero functions. I'm marking this as a question and moving to the next milestone.
The main issue here is that we might end up rewriting all non-zero routines like `nonZeroInterator`, `eachNonZero` and `foldNonZero`. In fact, we should be able to skip zero elements in...
An example of usage: ``` java Matrix a = ... Matrix b = a.pipeTo(LinearAlgebra.GAUSS_JORDAN).invert(); ```
``` java Matrix a = ... // GAUSS_JORDAN is no longe a factory in an operation from Matrix to MatrixInverter MatrixInverter = a.pipeTo(LinearAlgebra.GAUSS_JORDAN); // A typical use-case Matrix b =...