Viswajith Venugopal

Hmm, this is by design. It's checking that the _deployment_ has the required annotation, not the underlying pods. Checking for the underlying pods would require writing a new template. What...

Got it. Anyway, this is valid use case, and will require a new check. I'll add it to the roadmap.

Yeah, pretty much. We are not planning to do it unless a lot of people explicitly ask for it (which doesn't seem to be happening).

I understand that. But can't this be achieved under the status quo? How does this new parameter help?

> Because my test reverses the entire regular, it does not take effect. Remember that the reason for the search is that the golang regular library does not support inversion....

@siperman You should be able to set the value in the check to `!^WEALTH-(\w{2})-(\w{4})-[\w_]+-(DEV|UAT|PROD)$`, and then I think it will do what you want?

> @viswajithiii ; any plans to support `Template`? in the same way, k8s `List` and `helm` are. Hmm, I'm not familiar with `Template`. Can you elaborate on how it's used?

Hmm, got it. Interesting. It's definitely worth tracking, but as low priority -- meaning we are unlikely to do it anytime soon internally, but we will accept a PR if...

Thanks @Dionmm! This makes sense and we can add this functionailty.

Thanks for the suggestion @andreisaikouski! This is something we'd like to do for sure. I've added this to our roadmap.