Violeta Georgieva
Violeta Georgieva
@JooHyukKim Currently nobody is working on this one.
> @violetagg I see. Would you allow me to work on it? seems quite interesting @JooHyukKim Yes sure
> @violetagg @bhochhi I'd like to hear more about your thoughts on what AccessEvents are and how they should behave. I believe that @bhochhi meant integration with `logback-access` https://logback.qos.ch/access.html
> yes, I wanted Netty to support AccessEvent so that logback-access can be supported. However, my original question is Why Netty didn't have support? Is that by design or other...
@Rattenkrieg There was no request for this feature as of today. It would be great if you can work on it. Which version do you need this feature?
> @violetagg I'm currently on 1.0.21, but it won't be an issue for me to migrate to 2.0.0. However there is pending #2327 which I guess is a blocker for...
Update: @mhalbritter and I found a strange behaviour related to `ChannelInboundHandlerAdapter` subclasses. More info https://github.com/oracle/graal/issues/4809
@mhalbritter Yeah we have a lot + those in Netty - so we need to describe all of them? For Netty 4.1 where do we need to do that? Also...
@mhalbritter Understood. For Netty 5 I will contribute there, but for Netty 4.1 should I contribute https://github.com/oracle/graalvm-reachability-metadata?
> I don't quite understand. You're adding only hints for types in your codebase, right? What is the separation between netty4 and netty5? Are these branches in your codebase? >...