vindarel

Thanks for your support and glad the Cookbook was useful to you. > Is there something missing/incorrect in the epub file? this needs more investigation :/

``` Validating using EPUB version 3.3 rules. ERROR(RSC-005): common-lisp-cookbook.epub/EPUB/text/ch002.xhtml(40,18): Error while parsing file: Duplicate ID "two-cols" ERROR(RSC-005): common-lisp-cookbook.epub/EPUB/text/ch002.xhtml(63,18): Error while parsing file: Duplicate ID "two-cols" ERROR(RSC-005): common-lisp-cookbook.epub/EPUB/text/ch002.xhtml(80,18): Error while parsing...

I am using pandoc 2.5 calibre (calibre 6.4)

alternative to study: see if we can have nice nodgui features in a lighter base system, by contributing a system definition that won't rely on these. This can also be...

oooh what a nice surprise, thank you very much! We'll do more testing with this.

sure, of course. You added a precision: > the flip side of the coin will be the loss of [canvas with fast pixel drawing](https://www.autistici.org/interzona/nodgui.html#org9d24d46), [hardware accelerated canvas for 3D rendering](https://www.autistici.org/interzona/nodgui.html#org5356b93)...

thanks for the report. I am not surprised, the terminal REPL is not a top-notch REPL, yet. But it isn't the only way to use CIEL. I can only encourage...

when you run your file as a script, the format is correct: ```txt $ ciel testarithmetic.lisp pass ... (TEST-ARITHMETIC TEST-+): (= (+ 1 2) 3) pass ... (TEST-ARITHMETIC TEST-+): (=...

it's fixed ``` ciel-user> (test-arithmetic) pass ... (TEST-ARITHMETIC TEST-+): (= (+ 1 2) 3) pass ... (TEST-ARITHMETIC TEST-+): (= (+ 1 2 3) 6) FAIL ... (TEST-ARITHMETIC TEST-+): (= (+...

There are possible improvements on this front and enabling users to use Quicklisp from CIEL out of the box is a high goal. Having them to *not* _rely_ on QL...