Sebastiano Vigna

I don't think navigable is happening in the near future, unfortunately. It's a lot of tedious work, and I think that the number of users would be small.

OK, but most users would not even understand such a specific comment. Moreover, the advisor talks about "reasonable" sizes and fastutil is designed for very large data (e.g., BigArrayBigList), so...

This is on the list, but it requires some work...

You are absolutely right. Did you do any kind of benchmark?

OMG I completely lost track of that. Yes, that would be nice as a replacement for sort(). I don't understand the continue—it seems a NOP.

Ahhhh I missed the { at the and of the for. I thought the if was the only instruction 🤦🏻‍♂️.

That'd be nice. Wanna try a pull request? First we should fastutilize NavigableMap/Set tho (sigh).

I fully understand your problem. A default return value is sensible for a non-sorted operation such as contains(), but it's utterly counterintuitive when order is involved. I think your proposal...

> On 29 Jun 2017, at 02:24, Peter Burka wrote: > > > Take a look and tell me what you think. > I'm a little behind schedule with this,...

But the problem here is mutability. The original post says, indeed, that they are loading the map in order. All strategies I can think for a sorted map based on...