victorusu

I have added the 3.4 https://github.com/spack/spack/pull/21540#event-4304236980

> Regarding the usage of this feature, I was thinking the following: > > 1. We should not change`-C` to accept multiple configuration files. > 2. Have a `RFM_CONFIG_PATH` type...

> I am a bit puzzled of what is the best for the default behaviour of the `-C` option, because eventually, I believe that we should always build incrementally on...

> > I am a bit puzzled of what is the best for the default behaviour of the `-C` option, because eventually, I believe that we should always build incrementally...

We should do this! This is a great idea. But I would vote to use a different syntax, something on the lines of ``` reframe create ``` that we could...

Dear Chris, I have the same questions as @wickberg. Do you have any timeframe for working towards this? Thanks.

I agree with this. I think this is the right move. IMHO, That's the "normal behaviour". If one wants to have the definitions from the environment one should set `flags_from_environ`...

We have seen this before. What we do at CSCS is to add verbose false to the toolchain. `toolchainopts = {'pic': True, 'usempi': True, 'verbose': False}`. As far as I...