Aleksey Loginov

Looks like you need zip operator instead?

What about most straightforward way? when you pass all comparisons to one lambda or something like this? like `observable.filter([](int v){return v % 2 == 0 || v > 3 ||...

Looks like it is because `range` observable uses scheduling under-hood via `identity_current_thread` instead of `identity_immediate` ```cpp template static auto range(T first = 0, T last = std::numeric_limits::max(), std::ptrdiff_t step =...

Same as for `first` i prefer re-using `take_last` for on_next. But let me to implement `take_last` by my own because I have some ideas about doing it in the more...

Same from the perspective of `_with_time` :)

Target goal of `std::execution` is a bit different comparing to ReactiveX, so, it is a bit another beast. @daniel-smith, if it is applicable for you, you can check https://github.com/victimsnino/ReactivePlusPlus as...

> @victimsnino, can you please elaborate on the differences between RxCpp and `std::execution`? Maybe you can share a link that discusses it? No, i don't have any. In my understanding...

> Still, it would be good to know if there are any concrete plans for the official ReactiveX implementation for C++. From what I'm hearing here, it seems like this...

Any updates related to this one?

Same as author of this issue =) [Second example](https://victimsnino.github.io/ReactivePlusPlus/v2/docs/html/group__creational__operators.html#ga9104f4682dddefb9021bb9f2c2025494) doesn't have autolink due to template parameter ```cpp rpp::source::just(expensive_to_copy_1, expensive_to_copy_2) ``` Doxygen version 1.9.6