ordinally

Trying to pin down regression. PR https://github.com/casey/ord/pull/703 is my last confirmed reference point before this performance regression on Mac.

I have observed the same issue in one of my wallets. Enough cardinal UTXOs available, still same message. Will investigate.

Updated the guide, thanks @RarePepeMaximalist for the pointer. Update for `ord inscribe` makes sense to me for consistency.

> Any chance CI might be permitted to run on this PR? @arik-so if you could update this PR we'll run CI. We'd like to integrate this for completing the...

> Probably not until this upcoming weekend. If you have pointers towards similar unit tests though, they'd be greatly appreciated! Thanks! This would be a test on the full mainnet...

@arik-so Sorry this took me a while to get to. Reviewed the cursed changes, looks good so far. I fixed the formatting so our CI is happy, but noticed your...

@arik-so Looked like the tests weren't updated for the cursed logic - please check if my changes make sense. Will now run inscription number validation, which will take a day...

See also #1403

Solved in #1897

Observed this as well. The issue is that in `ord::subcommand::server::Server::inscription` the `SatPoint` for these inscriptions has an all-0 `Txid` coming out of the index - which shouldn't happen. Attached is...