venkataanil

I have done changes to support this https://github.com/venkataanil/infrared/commit/5b8524ec34d097a0df3f5869195d1bc3092833bf Will push patches to gerrithub for review

Sure thanks. I have submitted the below patches for review for the same 1) virsh: support multi hypervisor https://review.gerrithub.io/c/redhat-openstack/infrared/+/461570 2) tripleo-undercloud: multi hypervisor support https://review.gerrithub.io/c/redhat-openstack/infrared/+/461574 3) vbmc: multi hypervisor support...

The last patch[1] couldn't get merged. I have rebased it [1]. Can some one please review it? [1] https://review.gerrithub.io/c/redhat-openstack/infrared/+/461583 note: Also please review this dependency patch https://review.gerrithub.io/c/redhat-openstack/infrared/+/475719

Thanks Yarboa. Can someone please review https://review.gerrithub.io/c/redhat-openstack/infrared/+/461583 (the last dependent patch) before closing this issue?

Here we have two things 1. Identify number of clients (LARGE_SCALE_CLIENTS) according to TERMINATIONS 2. From results.csv file, use only 200 status requests for latency calculation We should reduce number...

Initially submitted this file in perfscale-managed-services repo with PR https://github.com/cloud-bulldozer/perfscale-managed-services/pull/110 . However I got suggestions to submit in e2e-benchmarking rather than perfscale-managed-services.