Vegard Stenhjem Hagen
Vegard Stenhjem Hagen
I love your enthusiasm! There's a lot of text here which makes it difficult to address everything in one reply, but I'll try. > What are your reasons for (maybe)...
Keeping issue open until I've updated the [article](https://blog.stonegarden.dev/articles/2024/08/talos-proxmox-tofu/) to include #226.
I'm currently not prioritising this PR. Please be patient.
See PR #334 for an alternative implementation. I think the Infisical integration should be a separate PR.
Can I close this in favour of #334?
@karteekiitg I think I get what you mean. I'll keep this PR open until remote state and Infisical is also in place.
@karteekiitg You've spent what I can image is a great amount of time and I'd like to have that reflected as well, which is why I want to keep this...
A dev container is now implemented in the main branch.
@karteekiitg Did you start a new org? I see that the source has changed. I also see that you added Cloudflare Bucket support. I applaud you for your eagerness, though...
> > I'd also prefer to split Infisical integration into its own PRs. > > My idea is, for new implementation, we should decide if we want to use a...