Valentin Churavy
Valentin Churavy
Can you erase on master?
Yeah we don't currently have a good mechanism to declare which operations can and can not take GPU memory. It seems even worse for OpenMPI since the set of supported...
On 1.9 with `--check-bounds=no` ``` • %2 = < pure > typejoin(::Type{…},::Type{…})::Core.Const(Number) (+c,+e,+n,+t,+s,+m,+i) ``` On 1.10 with `--check-bounds=no` ``` • %1 = invoke typejoin(::Type{Int64},::Type{StaticInt{2}})::Any (+c,+e,!n,+t,+s,+m,+i) ``` This might be #48684...
Kinda, https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/48684 replaced special handling of the almost intrinsics. So it's more than just a removal of pure.
Putting this on the milestone since we will need to fix this in either `1.10.0` or `1.10.x`
For me `@consistent_overlay` and `executable` are orthogonal. - `consistent_overlay` states: You may execute the original method instead of the overlay and you are guaranteed to obtain the same results -...
We discussed this during the multi-threading WG call. I just tested locally and it looks good. Deployed this to https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/50880 and we will see what Base CI says.
@StefanKarpinski this looks good on Base CI. This does require Julia 1.8 though, how do you want to handle that?
So should I just remove the CI for 1.3? Or do you want a `VERSION >= v"1.8.0"` check?
You mean http://mxnet.readthedocs.io/en/latest/packages/python/module.html ? I can make an attempt at wrapping the underlying interface.