vcarceler

Results 5 comments of vcarceler

Install flatpak packets in OpenZFS it's too slow. OSTree over OpenZFS it's too slow.

I'm not sure if this is relevant but we have observed a great performance disparity installing flatpaks on SSDs with OpenZFS. Installing Gimp lasts: On SanDisk SDSSDP12 120GB ``` real...

Install flatpak packets in OpenZFS it's too slow. OSTree over OpenZFS it's too slow.

Here are results from `iperf record `and `strace -o` New OSTree repo: `ostree --repo=repo --mode=bare-user-only init` Download Linux source code: `mkdir tree; cd tree; wget https://github.com/torvalds/linux/archive/v5.10-rc3.tar.gz; tar xzf v5.10-rc3.tar.gz; cd...

Install flatpak packets in OpenZFS it's too slow. OSTree over OpenZFS it's too slow.

Just for comparison. The same `ostree --repo=repo commit --branch=foo tree/` in a EXT4 fs mounted on a loop device runs in 17 seconds and produces: - perf.data -> https://cloud.elpuig.xeill.net/index.php/s/SqY1HlMQcIfOHYI -...

Install flatpak packets in OpenZFS it's too slow. OSTree over OpenZFS it's too slow.

I tested `cp -l` and `ln` without noticeable performance penalty. I understand that OSTree use a lot of hardlinks, but it uses hard links in the very first `ostree commit`?...

Install flatpak packets in OpenZFS it's too slow. OSTree over OpenZFS it's too slow.

I noticed that in `repo/objects` all files have date `ene 1 1970`. Maybe a `ostree commit` make a lot of changes in files metadata? But `touch` on files to change...