Geordon Worley

I am looking for this feature as well. This should not be closed. Can this be reopened?

Not stale.

@art-in I am not the author, but this thing is not using actix 2.0 (currently in release candidate). It is using a pre 1.0 actix. The db call does not...

@art-in Most likely, but I have only started using Actix with std::future support.

I think that there really isn't a convenient alternative for destructuring boxes without adding a lot of extra nesting. Personally, in very `box`-heavy code I would prefer that `box` destructuring...

That is a much better approach than the #117 stuff I did. I think that, going forwards, `cxx` is probably the only reasonable way to try and male OpenCV bindings....

Drawing on a figure changes the data inside of it, just like how slices are borrowed mutably when you get a mutable reference from one of their elements. For instance,...

@Pzixel See the documentation [here](https://nebgnahz.github.io/cv-rs/cv/mat/struct.Mat.html#method.ellipse) for ellipse. It does not return a new `Mat`. It mutates the `Mat` it is called on. I used this in my SIFT example just...

See the code [here](https://github.com/opencv/opencv/blob/332c37f332733e5a2d717fc6eb4d605a304cda70/modules/imgproc/src/drawing.cpp#L710). This is the macro in the line drawing portion of ellipse. It is complicated to follow, but before that you have the line [here](https://github.com/opencv/opencv/blob/332c37f332733e5a2d717fc6eb4d605a304cda70/modules/imgproc/src/drawing.cpp#L658) where the...

@yuvallanger I intend to send a PR to fix it to have the correct mutability if I haven't already as part of the refactor. I don't want to modify the...