un1versal

> I remember having a min/max width setting in version 3.x, even something like that would be cool. You get minimum dont use it if you dont like it, >...

well no one else cared since 2011 so Im not going to do anymore about this and disagree with max values here. You are welcome to have at it for...

...quite a slap in the face after the months of work I put into this project. but there we have it. I also am fully capable of understanding this feature...

We have enough labels here, I meant its not worth implementing the maximum width. The minimum width solved an issue in #900 the maximum width is just a one person...

Some screenshots would help from you. Theres no more Qt4 its just not supported anymore, gone and will never come back., your bisect only confirms this. Based on my experience...

yea... looks good and it will except for the parts where we customize things like tooltips and other areas... dcc transfer window for instance... just noticed it its unstyled some...

Thanks for that detailed explanation sure clarifies some things. We customise a few things that GTK wont style in part, tooltips for instance, the transfer progress indicators, some headers and...

GitHub mardown does `*this is italic*` _this is italic_ `**this is bold**` **this is bold** `***this is bold italic***` **_this is bold italic**_ We already have bold with other ctrl...

correction we now have italic

Do we really want to implement this? Why is this better than the control characters we have now?