Artem Pelenitsyn

I think it does: bindists are built in GitLab CI, and here's the relevant line: https://github.com/haskell/cabal/blob/49e3d183c0a9ac16da8d4afacc6b8a274ee67608/.gitlab/ci.sh#L64 Generally, try to grep through the repo: sometimes you'll find curious things... :-)

The above message from the bot is a cryptic way of saying that there are rebase conflicts that it can't solve automatically; hence, a human-driven rebase is needed...

How did you manage to create an issue without labels? The templates suggested put labels automatically. Please, use the templates going forward!

Fair enough. We need better templates then!

Thanks @jgotoh ! Will take a look eventually. @gbaz you know this code better than anyone currently active, i think. Would you be able to provide guidance?

@grayjay I know you’re more of a solver person, but if you happen to have some time for advising and feel comfortable in this part of the code, your contribution...

@jgotoh there's a bi-weekly cabal devs meeting, where, I am sure, people would be delighted to hear your experience so far. The closest one is this Thursday (Apr 20th), 1...

@jgotoh cool! let me know if you want me to mail you the jitsi link beforehand.

@Kleidukos do you think you could relax base bound in haddock-api on Hackage through a revision, by any chance? That is, 4.17 » 4.19. Looks like a no-brainer to me,...

I think separate channel is exactly the right solution here. If cabal-cache is used by someone settng up a CI, they will probably have an adequate impression of what it...