Ülgen Sarıkavak
Ülgen Sarıkavak
@sarahboyce I really do understand where you are coming from, and I'd just approve this if we were talking about a project that is applying updates often and quickly. Given...
Adding the link for easier review: https://pypi.org/project/django-flatpages-extra/
+1 for having the "is published" feature and revisions, but not sure about offloading both of them to a new package. * If we are going to keep history, I'd...
> The "small custom model" is how django-flatpages-extra started. I originally created it inside the source code of this site, but realized it could be useful as a third party....
@bmispelon Do you think we can use an unreleased version of Trac? It seems we could get few more years from Trac if we do so, but I don't feel...
@auvipy I think this can be merged.
I tested the `psycopg[binary]` and it seems switching to binary doesn't cause any issues: https://github.com/django/djangoproject.com/pull/2212 Ping @pauloxnet
@thibaudcolas Thanks for the insight. We have a PR ready, and I can apply the same changes to https://github.com/django/code.djangoproject.com too.
> Historically, in psycopg2, the use of the binary package was discouraged for use in production environments. > See https://www.psycopg.org/docs/install.html#psycopg-vs-psycopg-binary I've been using the binary version since the introduction with...
@pauloxnet Follow up question: > because it was the smallest change possible I missed why the [c] but not vanilla? It seems that it was an equally valid option and...