Ullrich Hafner
Ullrich Hafner
The new step `recordCoverage` is now in [beta testing](https://github.com/jenkinsci/code-coverage-api-plugin/releases/tag/v4.0.0), can you please check if this release helps to solve this issue? Please note that the syntax of the step is...
If someone wants to volunteer I can offer some help. There is no issue required to add new parsers.
The new step `recordCoverage` is now in [beta testing](https://github.com/jenkinsci/code-coverage-api-plugin/releases/tag/v4.0.0), can you please check if this release helps to solve this issue? Please note that the syntax of the step is...
> @uhafner Can you clarify if mergeToOneReport was removed just for JaCoCo or for all parsers? Is merging the default behavior or is merging no longer supported since it's not...
There needs to be an `if` guard around https://github.com/jenkinsci/coverage-plugin/blob/ee3e8c2926bef8c4efd3da68445795d38dd6b6e1/plugin/src/main/resources/io/jenkins/plugins/coverage/metrics/steps/CoverageViewModel/index.jelly#L56. In the `CoverageViewModel` an associated boolean method needs to be added if not already there. (On the action we have it...
> > There needs to be an `if` guard around https://github.com/jenkinsci/coverage-plugin/blob/ee3e8c2926bef8c4efd3da68445795d38dd6b6e1/plugin/src/main/resources/io/jenkins/plugins/coverage/metrics/steps/CoverageViewModel/index.jelly#L56. > > In the `CoverageViewModel` an associated boolean method needs to be added if not already there. > >...
The new step `recordCoverage` is now in [beta testing](https://github.com/jenkinsci/code-coverage-api-plugin/releases/tag/v4.0.0), can you please check if this release helps to solve this issue? Please note that the syntax of the step is...
The new step `recordCoverage` is now in [beta testing](https://github.com/jenkinsci/code-coverage-api-plugin/releases/tag/v4.0.0), can you please check if this release helps to solve this issue? Please note that the syntax of the step is...
Yes, this is already part of #512. You can install a snapshot if you want to test. > to get the coverage results. What results are you actually expecting? The...
Ok, the current PR exposes the same results in a different schema, but you should find everything you need. ``` { "_class" : "io.jenkins.plugins.coverage.metrics.steps.CoverageApi", "modifiedFilesDelta" : { }, "modifiedFilesStatistics" :...