Benjamin Uekermann
Benjamin Uekermann
@Alphaoo1 Please see #1071
> I like the meshless term! Me not :grin: :see_no_evil: `meshless` stands pretty much for [meshless / meshfree methods](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meshfree_methods), so still space-dependent data. > Global is a strong word and...
Good points. There are indeed still a few open aspects. > What about adding an attribute to the data tag instead? Yes, possible. Maybe depends on whether we add more...
@kursatyurt Thanks for the input! I am not sure if collocation points are the best example here. The data should be space-independent. What you describes sounds a lot like https://precice.org/couple-your-code-direct-access.html,...
> Note: This comment may be discussed in https://github.com/precice/precice/issues/1525 Yes, let's discuss there ## Regarding `DataContext` `DataContext` and a potential `GlobalDataContext` might not even have so much in common: -...
I think we should also allow using global data in convergence measures and acceleration. Maybe an open problem: does the preconditioner in the acceleration work sufficiently well for global data?...
No, that's unfortunately unrealistic. I guess that most of the points above are still open. Independent of that, I would not delete the old gather-scatter mode as it is helpful...
Trigger could also work by talking to the bot. Maybe we don't want to do this for every PR.
Later fine :+1:
There is actually no real difference between `Data` and `GlobalData`. There is even no pointer to `Mesh`. We could simply reuse `Data` and set `_hasGradient` to `false` (a valid case...